Date: 2004-04-04 06:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] blenrock.livejournal.com
what on earth is that??? are they serious? do they really think they've done something brilliant and original?

Date: 2004-04-04 06:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sniffnoy.livejournal.com
Of course not; it looks to me like they just got tired of people discussing it on their forum.

Date: 2004-04-04 07:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ahhhdontpokeme.livejournal.com
Just to bug them, someone should ask if it's equal to transcendential 1, or merely real number 1.

Date: 2004-04-04 07:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ahhhdontpokeme.livejournal.com
I probably didn't use proper terminology. But you know, 1 is always 1 in the real numbers, but on the infinitesimal scale, 1 doesn't necessarily equal 1 exactly. Thus 1^infinity is an indeterminate form.

Date: 2004-04-05 05:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ahhhdontpokeme.livejournal.com
like 1 plus or minus a differential. or the 1 that results in the limit for e.

Date: 2004-04-05 07:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sniffnoy.livejournal.com
*beats Xiao with soda bottle* NO! BAD XIAO! Differentials do not exist!

Date: 2004-04-04 08:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jonpin.livejournal.com
Note that it appears to be a few days old. Three to be exact. And today's April 4th. ;-)

Date: 2004-04-04 08:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] blenrock.livejournal.com
ooh, you're right. clever. =)

Date: 2004-04-04 07:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ashleyisachild.livejournal.com
wasn't that proved a long time ago? with a briefer and simpler proof?

Date: 2004-04-04 07:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sniffnoy.livejournal.com
Well really that's a nice simple proof, the only problem is that it's already assuming it converges. And you know it converges because you know it's geometric, which means you already know its sum is .9/(1-.1)=1. So yeah, it *is* making things overly complicated, really. But then again I suppose this proof is aimed at those who don't understand the concept of convergence and don't know about geometric series. :P

Date: 2004-04-04 09:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ashleyisachild.livejournal.com
What about this proof:
1/3 = 0.33333....
2/3 = 0.66666....
1/3 + 2/3 = 3/3 = 1
0.99999... = 0.33333... + 0.66666... = 1
?

Date: 2004-04-05 02:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sniffnoy.livejournal.com
But once again, you're relying on what you already know about geometric series, which means, once again, you can skip all that and go straight to the .9 repeating =1.

Date: 2004-04-04 07:18 pm (UTC)

Date: 2004-04-06 07:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] grenadier32.livejournal.com
...only at the Academy can someone post an entry about this and get 15 comments in response. Er, 16. :-P

Date: 2004-04-07 05:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sniffnoy.livejournal.com
But none of the people who replied (excluding myself) go to the Academy (anymore), and 3 (including you) never did...

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
Page generated Jan. 30th, 2026 05:48 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios