More from ahbou
Sep. 13th, 2005 07:29 pmThis was reposted on ahbou, and I thought I'd repost it here:
Subject: Re: Can You Have Infinity Without Eternity?
From: lrudolph@panix.com (Lee Rudolph)
Newsgroups: sci.math
Gerry Myerson <gerry@maths.mq.edi.ai.i2u4email> writes:
>In article <dfsc40$79f$1@news.math.niu.edu>,
> rusin@vesuvius.math.niu.edu (Dave Rusin) wrote:
>
>> In article <dfs7k7$ori$1@news.msu.edu>, <stephen@nomail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Nobody ever asks for an all encompassing definition of
>> >'prime' or 'even'.
>>
>> But they should! Consider two demonstrations of the cuts of beef
>>
>> http://www.ansi.okstate.edu/resource-room/meats/cutsofbeef/b&wcutsofbeef.jpg
>> http://images.foodnetwork.com/webfood/images/tv/goodeats/beef_map.gif
>>
>> These show two distinct decompositions of the same thing into
>> irreducible pieces; how then can we speak of "prime" cuts of beef?!
>
>Well, who ever said a cow was a unique factorization domain?
Or indeed a domain at all? In these days of factory farming,
it's the rare and lucky cow that ever finds itself embedded
in a field.
Subject: Re: Can You Have Infinity Without Eternity?
From: lrudolph@panix.com (Lee Rudolph)
Newsgroups: sci.math
Gerry Myerson <gerry@maths.mq.edi.ai.i2u4email> writes:
>In article <dfsc40$79f$1@news.math.niu.edu>,
> rusin@vesuvius.math.niu.edu (Dave Rusin) wrote:
>
>> In article <dfs7k7$ori$1@news.msu.edu>, <stephen@nomail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Nobody ever asks for an all encompassing definition of
>> >'prime' or 'even'.
>>
>> But they should! Consider two demonstrations of the cuts of beef
>>
>> http://www.ansi.okstate.edu/resource-room/meats/cutsofbeef/b&wcutsofbeef.jpg
>> http://images.foodnetwork.com/webfood/images/tv/goodeats/beef_map.gif
>>
>> These show two distinct decompositions of the same thing into
>> irreducible pieces; how then can we speak of "prime" cuts of beef?!
>
>Well, who ever said a cow was a unique factorization domain?
Or indeed a domain at all? In these days of factory farming,
it's the rare and lucky cow that ever finds itself embedded
in a field.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-14 01:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-14 10:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-14 04:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-19 08:27 pm (UTC)The other day... I was eating lunch (some sort of mentor-mentee event) with a couple of complex analysts (professors) here. One of them says "I have theorems named after me." "Which, for instance?" "The Beals 3-s theorem." "Ssssh!!!! Not in front of the children!" (This professor is very oddly like you, by the way.) "What?" **Other students look confused** "What does the s stand for?" "Smooth--- I'm a smooth operator!"
Oh boy.