sniffnoy: (Kirby)
You can go read it here: https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.03199

I'm not going to bother trying to summarize this one, you can go read it. Hopefully soon Alakh writes his follow-up that will cover the case of strings of length less than ωω, rather than just strings of length less than ωk, like I did here?

(Back in March of last year when I was in Belgium, and he told me how he did it, I was like, how did I miss it! It's so simple! But I did miss it, so, I'm doing ωk and he's taking ωω.)

Next paper in the pipeline will probably be the one on Zeckendorf addition, I've been convinced I need to get that out quickly, although I still haven't heard back from Sophie MacDonald, hm, I guess I didn't write about that here, but, uh, there's a thing she says she has a proof of which it would be very helpful to me if she actually does!

After that... oy, too much to write, too little time to write it in... well, I'll figure something out... (I also should, like, start looking for a new job soon probably...)

(Um, unrelatedly, we're down to just 179 books left to give away!)

There's some other stuff I've been meaning to write about, but, uh, I'll get to that some other time...
sniffnoy: (Golden Apple)
What if instead of the oval office we called it the egg office
sniffnoy: (SMPTE)
I haven't mentioned the bookshelves in a while so I should probably say that we're down to only 183 books! I definitely didn't expect it to get this low this soon!

One of those books has been set aside by Chang to take at a later time -- unfortunately she hasn't come by in months. Well, hopefully sometime soon she'll show up and take it and we'll be down to 182, or fewer...

UPDATE 7/21: I delivered it to her, we're at 182! :)
sniffnoy: (Chu-Chu Zig)
I thought there was an English word "stoor" that meant animal droppings.

Checking dictionaries, no such word appears to exist. (I mean, there are English meanings for "stoor", but they're all kind of obscure or specific to UK dialects, and none of them are that.)

I am really wondering where I got this idea. A misreading of "stool", maybe? Unfortunately I don't think it's really possible to answer this question...

EDIT: Oh. I was thinking of the word "spoor". Oops.

EDIT AGAIN: Which doesn't actually just mean droppings! Huh!
sniffnoy: (Golden Apple)
You know, if a monastery ever needed to needed to lock up one of its members who'd committed a crime, that member would still have advertising sent to them via the postal service.

That's right, I'm saying they still get junk mail in monk jail.
sniffnoy: (Golden Apple)
Interviewer: So, you're a werewolf.

Werewerewolf: Well, not quite. I'm a werewerewolf.

Interviewer: A werewerewolf?

Werewerewolf: Yes.

Interviewer: How does that work?

Werewerewolf: Well, when the full moon comes out, I change into a werewolf.

Interviewer: I'm a bit unclear as to what that means, concretely. So you don't change into a wolf?

Werewerewolf: Well, I change into a werewolf, but it is true that as a werewolf, I change into a wolf.

Interviewer: But if you change into a wolf under a full moon, doesn't that make you a werewolf?

Werewerewolf: No, I'm only a werewolf under a full moon.

Interviewer: But it all works out the same ultimately, right?

Werewerewolf: Well, you see, the werewolves, under the full moon, they're wolves. I'm a wolf *and* a werewolf.

Interviewer: But in that state, they're *also* both wolves and werewolves!

Werewerewolf: True, but under the full moon I'm all of a wolf, a werewolf, *and* a werewerewolf.

Interviewer: Look, so under the full moon you're a wolf--

Werewerewolf: And a werewolf!

Interviewer: And a werewolf, yes. And otherwise you're a person.

Werewerewolf: And a werewerewolf.

Interviewer: Right. So, ultimately, you occupy the same shapes at the same times that werewolves do. Am I missing something?

Werewerewolf: Definitely.

Interviewer: Which is...?

Werewerewolf: That I'm a werewerewolf.

Interviewer: If I had another werewolf on here--

Werewerewolf: You mean if you had a werewolf on here.

Interviewer: Right, of course. If I had a werewolf on here, would they be able to tell that you're a werewerewolf and not a werewolf?

Werewerewolf: Oh, yeah. They, uh... I'm actually not allowed to join the werewolf packs. Because I'm not one, you see.

Interviewer: Oh really?

Werewerewolf: Oh yeah. "No wereweres", they say. It's a rule.

Interviewer: And how can they tell you're a werewere?

Werewerewolf: Please don't call me that. It's considered pejorative.

Interviewer: Oh, sorry. Um, how can they tell you're a werewerewolf?

Werewerewolf: I mean they know me, it's well-known.

Interviewer: Not to me...

Werewerewolf: Well, that's hardly my fault. You know now.

Interviewer: But what if a werewerewolf were to come visit from out of town? How would the werewolves tell?

Werewerewolf: Well, because under a full moon, instead of turning into a wolf, they'd turn into a werewolf.

Interviewer: And how would they tell the difference?

Werewerewolf: Look, if you can't tell the difference between a wolf and a werewolf--

Interviewer: Ordinarily I can but during a full moon I sure can't!

Werewerewolf: Really? Are you a werebat? Because that would certainly explain--

Interviewer: No, I'm not a werebat!

Werewerewolf: Maybe just a wereidiot, then.

Interviewer: OK, I think we've had enough here. Um, thanks for coming on here, now please get out.

Werewerewolf: Yeah, sure. Thanks for having me on your stupid show.

Interviewer: Bite me.

Werewerewolf: If I get a chance, I will!

Interviewer: When you're a wolf, you mean.

Werewerewolf: When I'm a werewolf. [Werewerewolf exits.]
sniffnoy: (Chu-Chu Zig)
So I hadn't originally planned on travelling anywhere for the solar eclipse.

I'd just gone up to visit [personal profile] joshuazelinsky just the weekend before, which I'd planned without accounting for the eclipse. A friend of mine had invited me to join them and some other friends on a trip to Canada that weekend to see the eclipse, but, well, a second trip, just a week after? Eh, I wasn't really feeling up to it and didn't join in.

So I figured I would just see the partial eclipse here from New York City. I mean, a partial eclipse is still cool, right? I'd seen the one in 2017 from Michigan, and, wow, that was certainly something!

Then, Sunday night, I get a message from Yanan. Hey, she says, you want to come with me and some friends on a road trip to upstate New York to see the total eclipse? It'd be a day trip. I'm like, OK, when and where would we meet up for this? And she tells me 7:30 AM. I'm like, no thanks, that's too early for me. I mean, you know my schedule...

But Yanan asks again, and points out you can sleep in the car y'know, and points out the next big one in the area won't be for another 20 years, and I'm like, y'know what, screw it. A partial eclipse I've seen before, but a total one never; am I really going to miss this chance? To hell with it, I'll stay up all night and sleep in the car so I can come see this total eclipse.

...I did not, in fact, stay up all night, but I only slept 3 hours. Then I got up and headed to Long Island City to meet up with Yanan and the others (including Will, who I hadn't met before, and who would do all the driving for the entire trip, holy crap...)

The trip was a bit of a mess -- but when you consider how unplanned it all was, it was surprisingly little of one. I didn't really realize how long it would be -- well, none of us did, it ended up taking rather longer to get there and get back than Yanan and Will had anticipated -- but I didn't even realize how far we were going. How far? All the way to Lake Champlain! Noblewood Park in Willsboro, NY. The intended time to get there was maybe like 4 and a half hours; it ended up taking 7. And similarly to get back.

Will and Yanan, our expedition leaders, decided to follow Google Maps's suggested route, which meant we ended up taking some roads that were definitely not the most obvious way and had us questioning the route, but, hey, we rarely faced horrific traffic (possibly as a result).

Our first stop was in (actually just outside of) Taghkanic, NY, where we stopped for gas and encountered a Buddhist temple. Huh.

Our second stop was... well, so, one thing about the unusual route was that it had a lot more of the things (winding roads, stoplights) that are likely to make me carsick. I wasn't close to throwing up (although at one point I asked if anyone had a plastic bag, which thankfully Yanan did), but I was not in great condition, so we stopped at the rest stop with the intent of buying some anti-nausea medicine (I hadn't brought any). I was like, will they really sell that there? But people were confident they would. Well, they didn't.

So our next stop was to make a detour to Saratoga Springs, where we stopped at a CVS to get the medicine, and at a deli for lunch -- I ordered a pork schnitzel sandwich, but of course, was in no condition to eat it right then. This was a significant detour and definitely added some time, beyond that from what we stopped for.

Fortunately the medicine eventually worked and I started to feel a lot less sick. It also made me quite sleepy -- when getting it, we got the less-sleep-inducing version, but it still did a lot to help me sleep. Before picking that up I did not in fact sleep in the car at all.

Given the delays (both from me feeling sick and things just taking longer than expected), we were still on the road when the eclipse started. Fortunately there weren't, like, people stopping in the road to see the eclipse or anything -- although we did while on the highway pass by one entrance where lots of people had pulled over to the side to see it. Why that highway entrance specifically, I have no idea. We didn't see this anywhere else. This wasn't even in the zone of totality yet, so you'd think they'd be driving to get there rather than stopping there...

Once we were in the zone of totality, there was some question of whether we should continue to the original planned destination or stop early to make sure we didn't miss totality. This led to some stopping and starting, and I complained, hey, you're going to make me sick again! Ultimately we did continue with the original plan, making it to the park with plenty of time left to catch the total eclipse (and with quite a view of Vermont across the lake).

So yeah! Total eclipse! First time seeing that... quite something. One thing I didn't realize, I thought that with the sun blocked out it was going to be, like, night. Not so; it only really got, like, evening-level dark. Like, even though we were out in the middle of nowhere, where the stars would certainly be visible at night (they were on the trip back), they weren't during the eclipse. Well, one was, but that's it.

Anyway, yeah, glad I went out there rather than just seeing a partial eclipse a second time!

Quite a few other people had come to the same park, actually... and not just other people from the town nearby, we talked to some other people who had come about as far as we had. Also, there was an adorable baby! Eventually Will was like, OK, we gotta go if we want to get back at a reasonable time (the eclipse hadn't actually yet ended at this point), so we got back in the car for the return trip. (Also, after totality, I finally started eating my schnitzel sandwich.)

I slept through a lot of the return trip, so I can't say a lot about it. We stopped for a while in Lee Park in Westport, NY so one of us could call someone as they'd scheduled. There were some neat birds there! I mean, OK, mostly just seagulls and Canada geese. But also a big black bird flew by that might have been a coromorant, and another one that maybe was the same one but looked like a different bird (not a cormorant) to me, and some small ones that flew by quickly and I couldn't identify. Also, there was a cool spider, but it vanished before I could get a picture of it. I ate the rest of my sandwich there.

We also detoured to Saratoga Springs again on the way back, this time to get dinner. We went to some Spanish restaurant; I didn't eat a lot because I'd only just eaten my sandwich, but it was pretty good!

I guess the one other notable thing that happened on the way back was our next attempt to stop for gas -- I'm not sure where it was. We stopped at a gas station only for Will to find that the machine wouldn't let him pay. We went to go inside to the store to ask for help, but the store was closed and the door locked. But there was still someone inside, cleaning up -- we got his attention, but he was just like, we're closed. But we were like, no, we're not here for the store, we're here about a problem with the gas! It took a while but finally he came out... and told us, no, it's not just the store, the whole gas station's closed. Which was pretty frustrating, as absolutely nothing indicated that it was closed! The signs were on and everything. Annoying!

He pointed the way to another one which was open, although on the way we made the mistake of trying another one that happened to be closed while looking completely open. And then we passed by a third closed one (just before the open one) and had the good sense to just skip that one. Oy.

Eventually we made it back to New York City, at like 2 AM, definitely later than intended, and like an hour after that I made it home... hoo boy. I slept until 2 PM the next day and it still wasn't nearly enough! (I couldn't sleep in any longer, I had a doctor's appointment to go to.) It wasn't until Tuesday night that I finally slept enough. (And it was Will who did all the driving, hope he slept well!)

So yeah, Yanan's impromptu eclipse trip! Definitely not doing that again, but hey, I got to see a total eclipse finally...

-Harry
sniffnoy: (Kirby)
We're now down to 199 books! There's nothing really significant about the number 200, mind you... except that Shaked made a market on it over on Manifold (and, correspondingly, I made it a category at this year's OBNYC predictions meetup). So yeah we can expect to be even lower by the end of the year; pretty unlikely that we'll add any books to the giveaway shelves.

(And Chang has set aside 3 books she means to take but hasn't taken yet, and there are two books my second cousin Jeff wants me to bring him next time I see him, so we should be down to 194 at most by the end of the year, and realistically lower because no way those would be all..)
sniffnoy: (Chu-Chu Zig)
So we received some mysterious packages recently. They weren't misdelivered -- they were all very clearly addressed to our apartment in our building. But the person they were addressed to was one "Amber McIntyre".

None of us knows an Amber McIntyre, or has any idea who this might be. A previous resident? It's not like we've got other mail for her in the past, like we have for other people who've moved out.

Maybe Amber lives in a different apartment? We tried just leaving the package out in the stairway in case it was really for a different apartment, but nobody claimed it.

Well, two of the packages were delivered via USPS, so I eventually just returned those to sender. We'll never know what was in them. But the third was from Amazon, and after talking to them they said we could just keep it[0].

So, we opened it! It had four glass bottles, with cork tops and glass straws (the cork tops have a thing for sticking the glass straws through). Huh!

-Harry

[0]You might say here, of course you could, that's the law in the US! But because the package was addressed to Amber McIntyre rather than to me, I wasn't sure whether the law covered that case, and I couldn't find any good sources on this that both seemed trustworthy and unambiguously did cover it. I certainly wasn't about to hire a lawyer to resolve the question!
sniffnoy: (Chu-Chu Zig)
So the other day the thought occurred to me, I wonder why Echad Mi Yodeya stops at 13?

And the answer that immediately followed in my mind was, duh, it's because what the hell is there 14 of? Just getting to 13 is hard enough! Already the verse for 11 is a stretch and the verse for 9 is a *big* stretch. I mean they could have stopped at 8, I guess, but 8 just isn't a lot.

...then today in discussion the 14 parts of the seder came up and I was like. Huh. That's a 14 right there. Dang it, that should be the 14th verse of Echad Mi Yodeya!

EDIT: Oh, oops, it's because there's 15 parts, not 14. The thing I was looking at combined "Motzi" and "Matzah", but those are usually considered separate. Well, there goes that idea.

(Unrelatedly, we're now down to 202 books!)

-Harry
sniffnoy: (Golden Apple)
So I went to Minneapolis last weekend for a wedding. On Saturday, as I left the AirBNB I was staying at to go to the wedding, a guy on the street came up to me, saying, I know you!

"Luke?" I said, because he looked kind of like a guy named Luke I used to know here in New York. But it was not Luke. "Alex!" he confidently named me. But I was like, nope, I'm Harry.

Still, the guy was sure he knew me from somewhere. "MST", he suggested. What's MST, I'm thinking, and then I realize -- "MST? Like in Missouri?" Yes, he says! "In Rolla?" "Yes!"

And so I asked -- do you know Heidi Soderstrom? And his answer was... no.

So, it's pretty unlikely that we had in fact met. I'm like, sorry, I didn't go to MST; I did visit my friend Heidi there a few times but that's it. But he was sure he knew me from there -- you were in my physics class, he said! (I definitely was not.)

Eventually I had to just go. The thing, I guess, that is a bit hard to convey via text, is just how much this guy was freaking out about this. (He also had two friends with him who were like not reacting to any of this.) I don't remember exact words, but he said a number of things to the effect of, this sort of thing doesn't happen!, and, the universe is telling me something! I was just like, coincidences happen, man, but this of course had no effect.

I told all this to Heidi, of course, and she was like, what was his name? And I was like, I don't know, I didn't ask. She was like, well, if he's right, maybe you'll run into him again! (She also noted that if he called it "MST", rather than "Missouri S&T", he was probably from before her time there.)

...well, the next day -- in the same place but at a different time of day -- I did! This time he was much calmer. His name is Nick, apparently. No last name, Heidi asked me when I told her this? Sorry, I didn't ask him that.

(Also I saw Shuo while I was out in Minneapolis!)

(Also we're now down to 207 books. And five of those have been set aside by Chang to take next time she's here, so hopefully next week or the week after. And there's two books that my second cousin Jeff wanted, that I will have to bring to him next time I see him, although that may be some months. Still, all those books will almost certainly get taken I figure, and that would bring us down to 200. So we'll almost certainly be under 200 by the end of the year, since that only requires one more book to be taken, and we still have most of the year left for that!)

-Harry
sniffnoy: (SMPTE)
So solutions are finally up so it's finally time to write about Mystery Hunt!

So because it's a month later, I don't remember things the best this year. I don't remember who else worked on various puzzles I'm going to write about, for instance.

Yeah Mystery Hunt had some real messiness this year. Early on the servers went down, so they unlocked the third round early and distributed the puzzles via Google doc. And then the hunt went long too; into Monday morning, oh boy. Second year in a row that's happened! We'll see how next year's goes.

Anyway, in addition to the usual OBNYC crew who are on Plant, I also brought along Laura and Maggie this year. They were also largely just there to see Boston, so they did less puzzling than some others on the team, but they did some. And I also went with them for some Boston exploration... went with them to Harvard Square after Hunt was over, although there wasn't as much interesting as I was expecting.

Hunter and Lee, who are not on Plant, were staying in the same hotel as me, but I only briefly encountered Hunter while up there... fortunately I got to see Hunter in New York after.

(New York is also how far we made it in the hunt... we were not close to winning.)

Anyway yeah I'm just gonna get on to talking about puzzles. Again, because it's a month later, I may not remember things as well this year.
Cut for spoilers! )
OK! That's all I gotta say! I think! Probably I could say things about a few other puzzles too but oh well! I gotta sleep! Goodnight!

(Unrelatedly: 226 books remaining!)
sniffnoy: (Dead face)
EDIT later that night: Fixed some stuff about the strong energy condition

So Nic, who has been writing his Physics for Mathematicians series, recently put up his article on general relativity. One thing he didn't go into a whole lot of detail is, just what is the stress-energy tensor?

Like he introduces it as, let's consider charge, if you want to do charge density as a scalar it doesn't transform properly, but you turn it into a 4-vector by combining it with current density, and, aha, now you'v got a perfectly good 4-vector. So for energy density, well, we know that in relativity you never consider energy by itself (it doesn't transform properly!), you consider it as a component of 4-momentum; but then if we make that into a density, 4-momentum density, that won't transform properly by itself, but you turn it into the energy-momentum tensor and now it does. Yay!

OK, but, like, what is this tensor? What are its coordinates, when we write in coordinates? We've got the energy density (time-time); we've got the energy flux or momentum density (time-space); but what are the space-space coordinates?

Well, they're exactly what they sound like -- things like, the density of x-momentum flowing in the z-direction. Now, these are often called "pressure" (for the diagonal coordinates) and "shear stress" (for the off-diagonal ones), but I don't like that description. Why? Because pressure is about force, that is to say, acceleration. But the energy-momentum tensor is supposed to be about, well, momentum, motion, velocity.

Sure, the x-pressure coordinate is equal to the pressure density that a plane oriented perpendicular to the x-axis would experience if we placed it there and held it in place and that plane stopped everything hitting it; but I mean we don't have to think of it that way, that's not to my mind fundamentally what it is, and like again this is assuming that it stops everything hitting it (as opposed to say, deflecting it, or letting it pass through, or whatever...). (Although I'm still going to say "pressure" as a convenient shorthand, even though I don't like thinking of it that way.)

But, there's something kind of weird here. A standard example in GR is the "perfect fluid", with energy density ρ and pressure P. How is this possible for nonzero P?? Like -- there's no momentum density, so nothing is moving. So how can there be flux of momentum?? (Note I deliberately don't say "pressure" here -- focus on what's moving, which is what the tensor is acutally about, not your physical intuition of pressure!)

Well, I realized -- imagine that at our point, energy is moving at a certain speed in a certain direction; but, simultaneously, it's also moving at the same speed in the opposite direction; that is to say, energy is *dispersing* in two opposite directions. Then the net momentum density at that point will be zero -- but there is still motion, and the space-space coordinates in Tab capture that! (This doesn't cancel out due to the quadratic dependence of the diagonal terms on velocity; if momentum flows in the +x direction, then it's positive x-momentum flowing in the x-direction, while if flows in the -x direction, it's negative x-momentum flowing against the x-direction, so either way it contributes positively.) They capture some component of the motion which is hidden but still relevant (and which will show up directly in the net momentum after a change of coordinates, so it's very real).

So in the perfect fluid, then, each point is constantly dispersing energy in all directions; so at each point there's no net momentum, but there is nonetheless motion, and the diagonal terms capture that. I much prefer this way of thinking about it -- this hidden component of motion -- to saying that it's pressure! For the reasons stated above.

I mean I'm wary of reifying too much, right? Turning too many derived notions into primitive notions. Treating them as things that must make sense and can vary freely, instead of thinking about what they actually mean and how this constrains them.

And this brings me to the main thing I wanted to talk about -- energy conditions. Like, Tab shouldn't be able to be just anything, right? It should be something that physically makes sense. (Not in terms of actual physics, mind you, where things are made of atoms; but, like, in terms of the sort of continuum mechanics that GR is based on.) At first I didn't think even a perfect fluid made physical sense in this sense, but now I accept it does. So what stress-energy tensors are possible?

Well, energy conditions are conditions on Tab that attempt to answer this, or at least give conditions that are necessary if not sufficient. Though he doesn't use the term, in his article Nic discusses the weak energy condition, which is that one should have vavbTab≥0 for timelike (and null) va; i.e., a timelike observer should always observe nonnegative energy density. There's also the dominant energy condition, which is stronger (and which Nic uses as motivation for the weak energy condition but then kind of discards?), which is that for forward-pointing timelike or null va, -vaTab is also forward-pointing timelike or null; that is to say, observed 4-momentum should never be superluminal. So, both those seem pretty reasonable!

(There's also the weaker null energy condition, where you only require vavbTab≥0 for null va; I'm not clear on what the use of this condition is.)

What do these conditions imply in the perfect fluid case? The null energy condition implies ρ+P≥0, quite a weak statement. The weak energy condition implies ρ≥0 and ρ+P≥0. So now ρ≥0 at least -- energy is nonnegative -- but pressure is still allowed to be negative, as long as it's not too negative. And the dominant energy condition implies ρ≥|P|. So again, negative pressure still allowed, but now also we've got an upper bound on pressure in addition to the lower bound.

What about the strong energy condition? (Which apparently is not actually stronger than the weak energy condition or the dominant energy condition, but which could be applied alongside them.) I don't really understand the strong energy condition, and some people apparently think it's too strong, but it's a thing people talk about. In the perfect fluid case it apparently implies ρ+P≥0 and also ρ+3P≥0, although, maybe I'm doing someting wrong but I haven't been able to derive the latter. But negative pressure is still allowed!

But I want to suggest a way stronger energy condition, based in what I was saying above about how Tab should represent actual motion. I want to suggest that Tab should lie in the closure of the convex cone on tensors of the form vavb. And like -- I'm not suggesting this as merely a necessary condition like the other energy conditions, but also a sufficient one.

This condition implies both the dominant energy condition and the strong energy condition. Like, to use coordinates, it implies that all the diagonal coordinates are nonnegative, so in the perfect fluid case, we finally get P≥0. But it also implies T≤0 (where T denotes Taa), which means that, in the perfect fluid case we also get ρ≥3P, a stronger upper bound on P than we got from the dominant energy condition.

Is all this reasonable? I dunno! But I feel like it ought to be, because dammit, Tab should represent motion, rather than being some reified free-floating thing!

Worth noting that what WP says about why the strong energy condition is unreasonable is because of the cosmological constant -- which I assume means it's counting the cosmological constant as part of the stress-energy tensor. But you don't have to do that! You don't have to interpret it that way, you can keep it separate. Or if you do want to interpret it as part of the stress-energy tensor, I'm fine saying that fine then, that part doesn't represent actual motion, my condition only applies to the rest. :P

So, uh, yeah... how reasonable is this condition? I sure think it's reasonable, but yeah. Also, can it be expressed in terms of coordinate-free inequalities? I hope so! My formulation is coordinate-free, obviously, but it's not in terms of inequalities; some of the inequalities I derived from it I only know how to express in coordinates.

Questions I should ask more people about, I suppose!
sniffnoy: (Chu-Chu Zig)
So normally this time of year I'd be writing about Mystery Hunt. The problem is, solutions aren't up yet as best I can tell!

So, uh, I'm holding off on that. Meanwhile, we're down to 229 books! So the bottom shelf of the medium bookcase is once again clear (aside from the book that doesn't fit anywhere else) and I've switched once again to de-packing the shelves on the tall bookcases. 5 out of 6 are now successfully de-packed!

So I figure we get rid of about 4 more books, get down to about 225, and all shelves will be de-packed. :) And then maybe I'll stop obsessing about this so much for now? :P

...although, Shaked put up a (play-money) market on Manifold about it, so, uh, yeah...

Anyway I want to write something about energy conditions in general relativity but that'll be a separate entry and maybe later
sniffnoy: (Golden Apple)
If you built a device for mice to pee in, you could call it a murinal.

(We're now back down to 233 books, btw!)
sniffnoy: (Chu-Chu Zig)
SGD: Spanish Grand Dollar
USD: Unquestionable Spanish Dollar
HKD: Hispanic King's Dollar
CAD: Castilian & Aragonese Dollar
AUD: Aragon Union Dollar
NZD: Negotiable Zaragoza Dollar

One can probably come up with more...

(thanks to Shaked for some of these :P )
sniffnoy: (Golden Apple)
Today I learned that Kappa, not knowing what it's called, has been referring to 70 Pine St as "Mr. Pointy"...
sniffnoy: (Dead face)
Oops, found one more such book. So now the bottom shelf isn't even clear-but-one anymore, but, still, we're getting there!

(There may actually be more such books, I'll have to ask Geoff, but...)

EDIT: There were. 8 more in fact, yikes. What a setback! So now we're back up to 242... (not 243 because one more got taken)

Edit again: Oops, make that 9 and 243...
sniffnoy: (Chu-Chu Zig)
So, we're now at 234 books on the giveaway shelves, down by 12 from 246. The lowest shelf on the medium bookcase is now clear (aside from "You Are Being Lied To", which fits nowhere else); indeed all of the lowest-visibility shelves are clear, so it's time to start switching from clearing shelves to unpacking shelves.

Basically, my second cousin Jeff heard about the bookshelves, and so I sent him pictures of what we have. He didn't want anything, apparently -- but his brother Matt did, asking for 15 particular books. (Well, 14 particular books, one of which is two volumes. Whenever I say "books", I'm counting physical volumes, not logical books.)

So, today, at the big post-Thanksgiving family gathering, I brought him the books he asked for! While there, Jeff asked, what about the books I asked for? And I was like, but you didn't ask for any? Uh, turns out he had and I missed it, oops. Well, fortunately Jeff lives much closer than Matt! So he can get them some other time, assuming someone else hasn't taken them first.

So that's the minus 15. The plus three is that I was looking at my roommate Geoff's bookcase and noticed three books that looked like they probably belonged on the giveaway shelves rather than his; and asking him confirmed it. Oops. So, that's three more books to give away...

If we can get rid of 8 or 9 more, then all the shelves will be unpacked and we won't need to worry about that anymore. :) (Although I could instead start clearing the topmost shelf... nah.)

Meanwhile, Andreas Weiermann and I finally got a report back on our paper that had been stuck in review for years! They want a lot of changes, but they sure seem to like the result and method, so! Now I have to actually do those... (well, or do most of it and get Andreas to do the rest).

-Harry

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
181920212223 24
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom
Page generated Jun. 23rd, 2025 02:59 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios