Memesheepage: Good ol' slander
Jun. 19th, 2004 11:51 pmLibel, really, since it's written, right?
But anyway...
Hm, I notice the ordered triple (
forcemajeure,
autumnmist,
toreun) appears twice. Let's feed it through again[0]...
This thing really doesn't like Jess, huh? Again.
...and now it really doesn't like Kieran. The next one, I think, is better.
One more time, why not?
Ewww... still several friends that have not appeared. Again? Sure.
Bleh, this thing keeps using the same friends! (Also, I don't think the preposition used with "perform a sexual act" is generally "upon". But what do I know?) Again. Let's get something new here.
*sigh* Forget it. It's not going to work. Note Kieran's kissing the bus conductor has actually come up twice now...
-Sniffnoy
[0]Actually, I did it once before the first one listed here, but I found the results simply too disgusting to repeat here.
--
"Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and
he's warm for the rest of his life."
-Terry Pratchett, _Jingo_
But anyway...
Hm, I notice the ordered triple (
This thing really doesn't like Jess, huh? Again.
...and now it really doesn't like Kieran. The next one, I think, is better.
One more time, why not?
Ewww... still several friends that have not appeared. Again? Sure.
Bleh, this thing keeps using the same friends! (Also, I don't think the preposition used with "perform a sexual act" is generally "upon". But what do I know?) Again. Let's get something new here.
*sigh* Forget it. It's not going to work. Note Kieran's kissing the bus conductor has actually come up twice now...
-Sniffnoy
[0]Actually, I did it once before the first one listed here, but I found the results simply too disgusting to repeat here.
--
"Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and
he's warm for the rest of his life."
-Terry Pratchett, _Jingo_
no subject
Date: 2004-06-19 09:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-20 02:28 am (UTC)EWWWWWWWWWWWWWW!
note
Date: 2004-06-20 08:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-20 10:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-20 04:19 pm (UTC)penguinone and grenadier32 took twenty minutes to decide what to tell the paramedics and the RSPCA.
blenrock and thelostpenguin do things behind grenadier32's back that are illegal in most of the world.
thelostpenguin once kept grenadier32 locked up in their basement for eight months.
thelostpenguin knows the truth about grenadier32 and kevboy2k.
toreun has secret, sordid fantasies about grenadier32 and acts them out with kevboy2k!
forcemajeure collects other people's underwear - and has some from sniffnoy and grenadier32!
The first I knew about--that's why I eat Cheerios now.
The second is a bad memory--he and I do not agree on many things.
The third one requires many more details, including a location where I can bring a camera for blackmail.
The fourth is something I didn't want to remember. Thank you very much for cutting my finger and pouring lemon juice on it.
I hope thelostpenguin can keep a secret...
WTF, how many people are involved in that!?
The seventh explains a lot.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-20 09:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-21 06:49 am (UTC)Friends with Jon from high school.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-21 08:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-26 02:45 am (UTC)Re the first one, I'm pretty broad-minded about people's sexual proclivities, but incest really isn't my thing.
Re the second one, I suppose it's plausible, since I actually live in a city with bus conductors, not just bus drivers. I can't prove it never happened.
Re the third one, now they're just throwing random accusations at the wall to see what sticks. It's like the Clinton impeachment all over again. And since when is it illegal to own gold? And do you honestly think a neurotic clean freak like me, who was just about kicked out of kindergarten for refusing to finger-paint, is going to fool around in a public toilet?
I guess you and I got a joint discount on the implants: bring a friend, save 10%.
And your Power Rangers boxers are hot.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-27 10:00 pm (UTC)And yeah, I agree with your comment on prepositions. It should be "with"... unless the second party is an inanimate object or something.
And what the hell is a "bus conductor"?? Was this thing written in England?