Hm.
Well, due to some bugs I've been forced to reset the style (as well as finally switch to S2).
Tags now work. Anyone who just wants to read about integer complexity can now do so here and ignore the rest of my writings.
Not sure whether I'll bother to bring this thing back to its old look. I probably will to at least some extent.
You know, I actually never could get custom styling to work as I wanted, so -- well, all that use of monospaced fonts? That was me manually putting <tt> tags around every entry. Yes, really. So that's still around but it looks very out of place now. Which is why I say I will probably restore the old look to some extent -- easier than stripping out all those <tt>s (or learning LJ's protocol and writing a program to do it).
Of course doing it this way also meant it appeared that way in everyone *else's* styles too, where it was already out of place, so...
Addendum: Woah. Looks like I can easily do monospace now, but the font size is too big (compare this entry to the previous one). Hm...
Later: Screw it. Back to <tt>'s.
-Harry
Well, due to some bugs I've been forced to reset the style (as well as finally switch to S2).
Tags now work. Anyone who just wants to read about integer complexity can now do so here and ignore the rest of my writings.
Not sure whether I'll bother to bring this thing back to its old look. I probably will to at least some extent.
You know, I actually never could get custom styling to work as I wanted, so -- well, all that use of monospaced fonts? That was me manually putting <tt> tags around every entry. Yes, really. So that's still around but it looks very out of place now. Which is why I say I will probably restore the old look to some extent -- easier than stripping out all those <tt>s (or learning LJ's protocol and writing a program to do it).
Of course doing it this way also meant it appeared that way in everyone *else's* styles too, where it was already out of place, so...
Addendum: Woah. Looks like I can easily do monospace now, but the font size is too big (compare this entry to the previous one). Hm...
Later: Screw it. Back to <tt>'s.
-Harry
