Mistake!

Sorry, I ignored the considers on RGSD because they are listed indirectly. What I said below *should* read: (changes in bold)

Anyway I found that while only 5 out of the 32 types did not have any pairs

Add to the list of pairs:

RGSDf/RGSDf, RGSDf/RGSMf, RGSDf/RGSMm, RGSDm/RGSMf, RGSDm/RGSMm

There are 38 pairs. 18, a bare minority, are self-pairs; note that this also means that 18 out of the 32 types self-pair. Of the 20 remaining pairs, 8 are with RGSMf. (Of course RGSMf really has 9 pairs because it also self-pairs.)

The following 5 types do not pair:

DGLDf DBLMm DBLDf RBLDm RBLDf

Of the 20 non self-pairs, 6[0] are between abcdm and abcdf. That leaves just 6 pairs of two actually different types where neither type is RGSMf.

[0]This is not due to me leaving out RGSD, but rather to simple miscounting.

THE EDGE OF DOOM!

I BEAT LEVEL 7 OF TOPPLER!

Hahahahahahahahahaha...

Level 8 is... "The Edge of Doom".

I think there are only 8 levels (because that's what's shown on the title screen).

Hehehe... it never occurred to me before that those elevators can have more than 2 states... that's why I could never figure out how to start level 7 off...

-Sniffnoy
...why does the spillchucker insist that "dreamt" is not a word?

--
I dreamt that I got carried away by a giant squirrel. Does that make me
a nut?

Let's start with some links

http://www.sudftw.com/contdcam.htm

And, for those who haven't seen it yet, http://www.giantmicrobes.com/

And...

On ashleyisachild and jonpin I found the personality quiz at http://devel.okcupid.com/. Now...

For each type, you'll notice, there is a list of "avoid"s and a list of "consider"s. Pinyam[0] noted that while DBLDf (Ashley's type) had RBLDm (his type) listed as a consider, the reverse was not true. Naturally you can guess what I did in response to that. I went to every single type, and drew a giant directed graph of all the considers. I ignored the avoids, though I might take account for those later. I also couldn't figure out what the h parameter does, so I left it out and ignored it. Note that I did not actually draw all the connections coming out of RGSMf, I just specially marked it, along with DBLDm and DBLDf.

Anyway I found that while only 8 out of the 32 types did not have any pairs (ie A consider B, B consider A), very few of the actual considers themselves ran both ways. Another thing I noticed was that, excepting RGSMf, no aGbcd type considers any wBxyz type. While I did not draw the avoids, I did notice there exist A and B st A considers B, B avoids A. Hm. Also it should be noted, if you haven't noticed yet, that the quiz is completely symmetric around sexual orientation, so I left that dimension off as it wouldn't have added anything to included. (Given that the quiz includes an option for bisexual, you would think there would be a way to display both at once, but I could find none.) Alternatively, you can think of it as abcdm and abcdf always have the same considered-bys. (And avoided-bys, but, of course, that was not recorded.)

Anyway, after I finally finished drawing the thing with all its horribly crossing arrows, I looked through it for all consider-pairs. They are:

DGLMm/DGLMm, DGLMm/DGLMf, DGLMf/DGLMf, DGLDm/DGLDm, RGLMm/RGLMm, RGLMm/RGLMf, RGLMf/RGLMf, RGLMm/RGLDm, RGLMm/RGLDf, RGLMf/RGLDm, RGLMf/RGLDf, DGSMf/DGSMf, DGSMm/DGSMm, DGSMm/DGSMf, DGSMf/DGSDf, DGSDm/RGSMf, DBSMf/DBSMf, DBSMm/DBSMm, DBSMm/DBSMf, DBLMf/DBLMf, RBSMm/RBSMm, RBSMf/RBSMf, RBSMm/RBSMf, RBSDm/RBSDm, RBLMm/RBLMm, RBLMf/RBLMf, RBLMm/RBLMf, RGSMf/RGLMf, RGSMf/DBSDf, RGSMf/RBSMf, RGSMf/DBSDm, RGSMf/RBSDf, RGSMf/RGSMf

There are 33 pairs. 17, a bare majority, are self-pairs; note that this also means that 17 out of the 32 types self-pair. Of the 15 remaining pairs, 6 are with RGSMf. (Of course RGSMf really has 7 pairs because it also self-pairs.)

The following 8 types do not pair:

DGLDf RGSMm RGSDm RGSDf DBLMm DBLDf RBLDm RBLDf

ADDENDUM: Of the 15 non self-pairs, 5 are between abcdm and abcdf. That leaves just 4 pairs of two actually different types where neither type is RGSMf. Also, I'll note here that, for whatever reason, RGSDm and RGSDf have no considers, though they do have considered-bys. Every type has at least one considered-by; the only 2 types with only 1 are DBLDm and DBLDf (it would be 2, but those also happen to be the two types not considered by RGSMf).

Do I have too much free time or what?

-Sniffnoy
...and I really *will* do the avoids, too... *g*
ADDENDUM (yes another one): Wow, I totally forgot to mention that I took the SAT today... it was easy, as always... maybe a few mistakes on the verbal...

[0]You can expect me to keep calling you that, Pinyam. *g*

--
This .sig will self-destruct in 5 seconds.